Looking Past Form to the Past: Reconsidering Modern Landscape Architecture Theory

Authors

  • Ken McCown

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34900/lr.v10i1-2.223

Abstract

This paper re-examines fundamental concepts inherent in Modernist architectural and landscape architectural theory. The author critiques Eco-revelatory theory and Modernist theory using space, transparency, structure, and the sciences versus the humanities comparatively. These ideas illustrate the differences between conceptual theory and physical form, showing Eco-revelatory design to be a truer expression of Modernist theory than mid-twentieth-century design. The author proposes that Eco-revelatory theory and design exist within the continuum of Modernism, and can benefit from the Modernist lexicon. This vocabulary can be valuable for arriving at a set of terms shared with architectural theory. This global theory, when applied to landscape designs and analyses, may yield physical forms highly attuned to local landscapes and buildings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

01-12-2004

How to Cite

McCown, K. (2004). Looking Past Form to the Past: Reconsidering Modern Landscape Architecture Theory . Landscape Review, 10(1-2), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.34900/lr.v10i1-2.223

Issue

Section

Short papers presented at the 2004 CELA