Connecting Research with Practice to Assess Landscape Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34900/lr.v20i2.1246Keywords:
practice research, post-occupancy evaluation, landscape performance, case studyAbstract
In current practice, landscape professionals are often required to provide ‘evidence’ of how their completed projects perform over time. However, few practitioners have knowledge of data collection methods or the resources, including time or money, to carry out structured post-occupancy evaluations of their built work. Using a case study approach to methodically describe and assess landscape architecture projects, as proposed by Francis (2001), is a way to systematically record project information and build a knowledge base about the design, construction, and project performance. Francis’ work informed the development of the Landscape Architecture Foundation’s Case Study Investigation (CSI) program, launched in 2010 with the aim of assessing landscape performance through the lenses of sustainability. The recently established Landscape Foundation of Australia is adapting the CSI Program for the Australian context. This article briefly traces the development of the case study method for documenting and assessing landscape performance, and how an Australian version will extend the original research-practice CSI model that has proven so effective.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Linda Corkery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).