Building collective know-how: Part 1: A case for more procedural knowledge in landscape architecture
Keywords:phronesis, reflective practice, design research, landscape architecture, practical knowledge, practice research
This article makes the case that building landscape architecture’s procedural knowledge – defined as a collectively-shared and critically-examined understanding of the diverse ways landscape architects design – is of critical importance to the profession and discipline, especially if the profession desires to become more relevant and valuable to society as a whole. Knowing-how to design is the core knowledge-base of the field. Landscape architects’ abilities to view complex situations holistically, engage in ethical deliberations, envision new possibilities, and weigh alternatives from multiple perspectives is the key to their design expertise. This design expertise is needed in order to create designs that respond to the complex problems of today’s society. More procedural knowledge is needed: (1) so that landscape architects can learn from each other, (2) so that beginning landscape designers have clear models upon which to build expert knowledge, and (3) so educators do not have to rely only on their personal experiences when teaching design. Because good designing responds holistically within particular circumstances, it is challenging to develop transferable knowledge about designing, but there are models from practice research that suggest how it could be done.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Katherine Melcher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).