Academic Statistics: Boon or Bane for Higher Education in Landscape Architecture

Authors

  • Amy Archambeau
  • Pat Taylor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34900/lr.v9i1.114

Abstract

Academic programmes in landscape architecture seldom understand their position in relation to other programmes around the world. The ranking of programmes is seen as potentially injurious to some, or as unachievable to others because of the various models used to teach landscape architecture. The result is unwillingness by some academic administrators to share information about salaries, policies, alumni accomplishments, curricula and the like.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

01-06-2004

How to Cite

Archambeau, A., & Taylor, P. (2004). Academic Statistics: Boon or Bane for Higher Education in Landscape Architecture. Landscape Review, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.34900/lr.v9i1.114

Issue

Vol 9, No 1 (2004)

Section

Abstracts of full plenary papers presented

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).