An investigation into the use of visualisations in the Resource Consent Process


  • Ben M Baird
  • Hamish Rennie



The use of Computer Aided Design (CAD) drawings or other static images (including photo-shop and simulations) to visualise potential future situations is common and powerful in planning processes.  Its production, use and understanding in gaining planning permission in the New Zealand context is investigated through interviews with 13 architects and planners in Christchurch.  The findings highlight the dilemma faced by planners in using visualisations and questions the drive for accuracy and realism in visualisations.


Download data is not yet available.


Appleton, K., & Lovett, A. (2003). GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, pp. 177-131

Baird, B.M. (2014). The effect of visualisation on the resource consent process: A case study in Christchurch City. Unpublished MEP dissertation, Lincoln University, New Zealand

Bressi, T., (1995). The real thing? We’re getting there. Planning, 61(7), pp. 16-20

Carrie, N. (2007, June). More - And Less - Than the Eye Can See. Planning Quarterly, pp. 27-29

CCDU. (2014). Te Papa Otakaro/Avon River Precinct - animated flythrough. Sourced from in March 2014

Coggan, T. (2007, March). Highly Accurate Visual Simulations Power Up Community Consultation Process. Planning Quarterly, pp. 25-27

Duhr, S. (2007). The Visual Language of Spatial Planning — Exploring Cartographic Representations for Spatial Planning in Europe. Oxford; Routledge. pp. 224

Faludi, A., (1996). Framing with images. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23(1), pp. 93-108

Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the Face of Power. Journal of the American Planning Association (48), pp. 67-80

Froude, V.A., (2011). Quantitative Methodology for Measuring Natural Character in New Zealand’s Coastal Environments. Doctoral Thesis, University of Waikato

Halibur, T., & Haugh, G. (2010, July 19). False Friendliness: Photoshopped People in Public Spaces Retrieved April 29, 2014 from Planetizen:

Kidd, V. V. (1998). To shape and direct the audiences point of view. Retrieved December 2017 from:

Lange, E. (2001). The limits of realism: perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning , 54, pp. 153-182

Lewis, J. L., Casello, J. M., & Groulx, M. (2012). Effective Environmental Visualization for Urban Planning and Design: Interdisciplinary Reflections on a Rapidly Evolving Technology. Journal of Urban Technology , 19 (3), pp. 85-106

Lewis, J. (2012). More art than science: the sources and effects of stylistic variation in visualization for planning and design. Evnironment and Planning B: Planning and Design , 39, pp. 551-565

Levy, R. (1995). Visualization of urban alternatives. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 22, pp. 343-358

NZILA Education Foundation (2010). Best Practice Guide — Visual Simulations.

Rabie, J. (1991). Towards the Simulation of Urban Morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 18, pp. 57-70

Sheppard, S. (2001). Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization. Landscape and Urban Plannning, 54, pp. 183-199

Smallman, H., & St. John, M. (2005, Summer). Naive Realism: Misplaced Faith in Realistic Displays. Ergonomics in Design, pp. 6-13

The Terrace. (2014). The Terrace. Sourced from in March 2014

Thomson, J., (2003).Coastal values and beach use survey report Environment Waikato Technical Report 2003/09. Hamilton: Waikato Regional Council

Wissen, U., Schroth, O., Lange, E., & Schmid, W. (2008). Approaches to integrating indicators into 3D landscape visualisations and their benefits for participative planning situations. Journal of Environmental Management, pp. 184-196

Xie, J. (2013, September 24). Is the Internet's Appetite for Sexy Renderings Hurting Architecture? Retrieved October 29, 2013 from The Atlantic Cities:




How to Cite

Baird, B. M., & Rennie, H. (2017). An investigation into the use of visualisations in the Resource Consent Process. Lincoln Planning Review, 8(1-2), 30–38.



Peer Reviewed Articles